Giles Poses a Question About the Lower End Online Auctions

Peter, When is someone going to seriously investigate Bloodstock Auction especially the sale ending today and the possibility of shill bidding? I’ve watched some extremely questionable bidding patterns, particularly involving the Arrowfield sales, and I cannot understand why nobody is looking into it. This isn’t the first time concerns have been raised. During a previous […]

In Reply to Giles

The 2 x $25 000 bonused – if won – are as far as we understand it funded by Arrowfield. Bloodstockauction.com.au simply administers the bonus scheme. The sale volume on the Arrowfield horses was about $155 000. Most if not all of the lots in the auction sold for well under the value of their […]

The articles published on this site are the honestly held opinion of the author, based on observation, research and the materials available to and read or watched by them. The author makes no representation that the opinions expressed are strictly factual or provable in law. Racing is funded by public money, and issues to do with racing and gambling are matters of public interest. The honestly held opinions expressed in articles on the site are published on the basis of the public interest in the integrity of racing. Should any person believe that the author's opinions expressed herein are incorrect we encourage them to contact the author at peterprofitracing@gmail.com with their concerns, and appropriate corrections, alteration and deletions where appropriate will be made.
error: Content is protected !!