Peter Inwood Appeal Live – Part 4

Inwood is dismissed. Murdoch chimes back in. He refers to a number of affidavits from various people. One is a farrier, another a showjumper, and the third a stockman and farrier. All three say that they saw River Danzka around the relevant time, and that it was in good condition. Murdoch then points to another […]

Peter Inwood Appeal Live – Part 3

Peter Inwood is sworn in. He says that when Neal approached him at the races he was with Steward D. Griffiths, and the three of them proceeded to the Stewards room. Inwood tells us that he told Neal that one of the horses in the picture was not his, and he maintains that. A. Turner […]

Peter Inwood Appeal Live – Part 2

Murdoch KC challenges Neal about the identity of the informant who gave him the photos of the horses. Neal only knows the person’s first name, not his surname. He doesn’t tell us what the person’s name is. Murdoch has a go at him about not showing both lots of photos to Inwood on the day […]

Peter Inwood Appeal Live – Part 1

We are off and racing in the Peter Inwood appeal. Jim Murdoch KC kicks off by saying that there is only one form of evidence against his client Inwood, which is three photographs. Murdoch wants them excluded. He says that the rules of evidence developed over centuries, and these snaps shouldn’t be allowed in. Murdoch […]

HRV Chairman Says Prizemoney is Not on His Top 10 Priority List – Will the Last One Out Please Turn Off the Lights and Lock the Door – Or Put the Bloke in the Bulb in Charge at Least

These words of the HRV Chairman have to be seen and heard to be believed. Prizemoney is not one of the top ten priorities of the boof headed boffins running the trots in Victoria. Money doesn’t matter in a free market driven world hey? I’m speechless. Here is what Bernie said. Fuck me dead. Watch […]

The articles published on this site are the honestly held opinion of the author, based on observation, research and the materials available to and read or watched by them. The author makes no representation that the opinions expressed are strictly factual or provable in law. Racing is funded by public money, and issues to do with racing and gambling are matters of public interest. The honestly held opinions expressed in articles on the site are published on the basis of the public interest in the integrity of racing. Should any person believe that the author's opinions expressed herein are incorrect we encourage them to contact the author at peterprofitracing@gmail.com with their concerns, and appropriate corrections, alteration and deletions where appropriate will be made.
error: Content is protected !!