Why Tweaked Peptides Can’t Be Picked Up in Swabs – Part 2 – The Cheats Tweak Them Too Quick

The analysis of prohibited substances used to improve athletic performance is an analytical challenge that requires the continuous optimization of methodologies in terms of sensitivity, precision, accuracy, recovery rate, decrease in the number of false positives, and analysis time, among others.

The role of peptides in research focused on antidoping presents extensive challenges for the future, mainly because it is necessary to obtain reference materials that allow the continuous development of analytical methodologies for their adequate detection.

Although many efforts have been made in this field, the chemical synthesis of peptides has been a relatively unexplored area.

Therefore, we believe that solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using the Fmoc/tBu strategy can be an important alternative for obtaining in-house reference materials with high percentages of yield and purity, which could be an additional step in the fight against doping, and that it would be suitable for the routine analysis of peptides with possible use as a doping agent.

The detection and/or quantification of synthetic peptides used in doping poses an additional analytical challenge due to factors such as emergence of new peptides, very short lifetimes, and low concentrations in the body, and they can mimic naturally produced molecules, trigger biological processes indirectly, etc.

Although significant progress has been made in the pre-treatment of samples and the instrumentation, which has allowed the development of more sensitive, precise, and accurate analytical methods, there are still some aspects that need improvement, such as detection and quantification of peptides with low concentrations in complex matrices and identification and characterization of biomarkers, especially for peptides with short half-lives, to obtain reference materials, especially those synthesized at home, in order to create strategies for the rapid detection of peptides, which are continually entering the doping market, among others.

Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
The articles published on this site are the honestly held opinion of the author, based on observation, research and the materials available to and read or watched by them. The author makes no representation that the opinions expressed are strictly factual or provable in law. Racing is funded by public money, and issues to do with racing and gambling are matters of public interest. The honestly held opinions expressed in articles on the site are published on the basis of the public interest in the integrity of racing. Should any person believe that the author's opinions expressed herein are incorrect we encourage them to contact the author at peterprofitracing@gmail.com with their concerns, and appropriate corrections, alteration and deletions where appropriate will be made.
error: Content is protected !!